puncher53 Says:

Apr 20, 2010 - geez, thats sad. good job russia, thinking that one through. has there been any sort of consideration for compensation for the people of kazakhstan from Russia? of course compensation wldnt cover the damages done to the people, but at least it would be a considerate afterthought eh? maybe add a formal apology too?

FarfettilLejl Says:

Apr 26, 2010 - Shocking, shocking and so wrong...

Nguli34689 Says:

Sep 24, 2010 - @puncher53 Yes, it is sad. Very sad indeed when one stops to consider the genetic damage done to the villiagers. The head of the Soviet secret police (the NKVD), Lavrentik Beria, didn't warn the villiagers. Amongst the Russian emigres, one was either Russian or a communist. You can't convincingly tell me that one can be both. In Lenin's words: "I spit on Mother Russia". A Russian would've been more considerate and empathic than a Soviet. Yes, it would be considerable for a Soviet to apologize.

Reqrezentin Says:

Nov 13, 2010 - They should have stayed a nuke power. wtfff is wrong with them.

meProudToBeCaucasian Says:

Jul 23, 2011 - @Reqrezentin they had ten times more nukes than britain you idiot and so had ukraine, think about the tension if khazakstan and ukraine would still have nukes to make a disarming agreement with russia and usa

bbphnix Says:

Oct 17, 2011 - @puncher53 the ussr was a tyranical state, of course they didn't care